Friday, June 7, 2019
Air traffic essay Essay Example for Free
Air transaction essay EssayToday many people state that the authorities have to clear up air traffic by introducing new charges, because airports generate a lot of noise and damage environment. The reason is huge demand for cheap flights, so on that point are too many people to use airline services. In my opinion, this idea is completely wrong, because of several reasons.To begin with, if in that respect be less people, who sess afford themselves to travel by air, past they will choose cars and other ground transport, what will cause a lot more pollution and traffic jams on the roads. Just compare 100 people on one plane and 100 people on 100 cars. It goes without saying that second excerpt is much more damaging for environment.Moreover, such soluton will cause dramatical fall in business activity, because people will not be able to run across production performance, visit important meetings and so on. Some people will say that these are just minor set-backs, but in fa ct, we will calculate the catalyst of new world economic recession.Finally, I see reducing air traffic as a slow-down of progress. If airlines and airports have less financial resources then they will not be able to maintain their development teams. As a result, world will be one-step further from creating new shipway of air travel. Following topics logic, we should start living in lairs and eat with the stick.In conclusion I want to say that services that enjoys groovy demand are essential for people and they became natural part of societys infrastructure. Today many people state that the authorities have to ease air traffic by introducing new charges, because airports generate a lot of noise and damage environment. The reason is huge demand for cheap flights, so there are too many people to use airline services. In my opinion, this idea is completely wrong, because of several reasons.To begin with, if there be less people, who female genitalia afford themselves to travel by a ir, then they will choose cars and other ground transport, what will cause a lot more pollution and traffic jams on the roads. Just compare 100 people on one plane and 100 people on 100 cars. It goes without saying that second survival of the fittest is much more damaging for environment.Moreover, such soluton will cause dramatical fall in business activity, because people will not be able to bind production performance, visit important meetings and so on. Some people will say that these are just minor set-backs, but in fact, we will compositors case the catalyst of new world economic recession.Finally, I see reducing air traffic as a slow-down of progress. If airlines and airports have less financial resources then they will not be able to maintain their development teams. As a result, world will be one-step further from creating new ship canal of air travel. Following topics logic, we should start living in lairs and eat with the stick.In conclusion I want to say that services that enjoys gravid demand are essential for people and they became natural part of societys infrastructure.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.